It needs one practical change and a couple of substantive legal changes.
1) The practicality: a national database of members
This already exists for clergy (in fact, there's more than one) so there can be no objection in principle.
There would need to be a Code of Practice governing (amongst other things):
- the duty to maintain the database and keep it up to date
- data protection, permissions given by those on the list as to the use of their data, and levels of access to the records, physical and electronic security
- the use of the data (in particular, contact details) by people who are already members (e.g. bishops, elected members of Synods)
- the use of the data by people who are not members (e.g. commercial firms), and for purposes other than church governance (e.g. by lobby groups).
Electoral roll officers already have a duty to keep the roll up to date. They would, in addition, simply have to pass on any changes to whoever manages the database.
These are important matters and will need careful consideration. But they are practical and organizational details that are well within the existing competence of the Church.
2) Changes to the Church Representation Rules
To elect members of Diocesan Synod
To change rule 30(5)(b) to read:Deaneries would probably be regarded as constituencies (though it's not essential) and wording to make this explicit would also be needed.
members elected by
the houses of laity of the deanery synods[insert] electors whose names are entered on the electoral roll of the parishes in the diocese in accordance with the next following rule
The equivalent change would need to be made in the rule governing election to General Synod:
35(1)(a) the members elected byThere would, of course, be a number of alterations to other parts of the Church Representation Rules which will follow from these changes - but they would be relatively straight forward once the principle change was agreed.
the diocesan electors[insert] electors whose names are entered on the electoral roll of the parishes of each diocese as hereinafter provided
OK, I'm not a lawyer or a parliamentary draughtsman, but the principle's clear.
Once General Synod decides in favour of 'One member : One vote' implementation will be entirely straightforward.
One member : One vote